{"id":4822,"date":"2026-05-23T23:49:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-23T22:49:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/?page_id=4822"},"modified":"2026-07-07T10:17:05","modified_gmt":"2026-07-07T09:17:05","slug":"ard-site-diary-2026","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/?page_id=4822","title":{"rendered":"ARD Site Diary (2026)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Thursday 2nd July<\/strong>
Day 15
Another great turnout with Andrew, Peter, Jen, Isabel, Gaby, Alison, Jon Shelley and John Needle joining Bill and Chris. We also had Gabriel and his mum Denise joining us for the second day of his two-day work experience placement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jen, Gabriel and Denise continue with their work on the northwest section on Trench 1b and Trench 1c. It now seems clear that we are beyond the stony later in Trench 1c but not in Trench 1b (stones seen at the edge of Trench 1c seemingly at the mottled clay level turned out to be part of the backfill btw). In the afternoon Andrew showed Gabriel and Denise how to set up the dumpy level and they heled him to take more readings for Bill.\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

John Needle was tasked with clean the stony layer revealed on Tuesday in the extension of Trench 1b on the southwest side. This confirmed the edge of this layer was going off in a northly direction. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before lunch Andrew was tasked with opening up a new section In Trench 1b starting from the outside edge of the curved alignment of large stones and going through the sandy clay patch devoid of stones (first discovered in 2023). The idea was to line it up (although on a dog leg) with the sondages either side of our stone box-like feature (F22) so that Bill could record a full section across this area. \"\"It has always been a mystery why this patch exists devoid of stones but still sealed below the burnt and mottled clay layers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Much attention was given today on the rising sandy clay mound trying to understand it relationship with original ground surface and the general mound of sandy clay that covers the whole of the interior of the ring ditch. \"\"Gaby worked on an area on the south side of the rising mound where flecks of cremated bone had previously been collected (B2). Although not finding much more she did manage to retrieve a tiny fragment of what appears to be a tooth. Alison continued her work cleaning out and taking down the cut on the southwest side clearly revealing how the stony layer on this side acts as a revetment to the rising mound (lying on top of it rather than embedded in it). At the bottom she came across a layer of harder sandy clay embedded with stones. \"\"This was turning out to be a theme a Peter, tasked with continuing the work of cleaning out the bottom of sondage on the southeast side of the mound (3a.S5 Ext), also came across a layer of harder sandy clay embedded with stones. \"\"Similarly Isabel, continuing her work on the embedded stones on the northeast side of the mound, also came stones at the very bottom of the trench. \"\"Jon also, working further out to the northeast on edge of the rising mound (before it reaches the cremation burial found under the two slabs – F12), revealed stones at the bottom of his trench. As with Alison’s trench we a clear section revealing the stony layer (even remnants of the burnt layer) acting as a revetment on to of the rising sandy clay mound. \"\"What this all means at this stage is unclear. Chris’s thoughts were that the embedded stones on the southeast side of the rising mound could originally have been a separate small cairn. However the arrangement of the stones in it didn’t seem to be supporting this theory as they seemed to be more randomly placed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 30th June<\/strong>
Day 14
With the weather back to normal our volunteer turn out was great today with 11 on site. Joining Bill, Chris and Patrick were Andrew, Steve, Isabel, Jen, Rachael Tynan (joining for the first time this year) and Peter (back from his hols). We also had Gabriel Morgan and his mum Denise – Gabriel is on a two-day work experience placement from St Bede’s High School Blackburn.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill spent much of the morning take Denise and Gabriel around the side explaining our site and giving them some insight into its Prehistoric context particularly with its association other sites around the region. He then set them to work with Rachael next to Trench 1c trowelling off the remaining soil from the stony layer. Rachael next to them in Trench 1c itself cleaning the floor of it looking for the arc of dark material first detected on Day10 earlier in the month. \"\" Jen meanwhile continued with her work on the cut along the northwest section particularly where it reaches Trench 1c. She had discovered a curious gap in the stony layer and Bill wondered if the stones reappearing next to Trench 1c were the embedded ones he had been looking for. \"\"After carefully removing them it was obvious they weren’t, just part of the usual stony layer lying under the burning and mottled clay layers. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Steve meanwhile continued his work in Trench 1b on the southwest side. Having established the stony layer did not continue to the northwest we needed to find out how far to northeast it went so Bill asked Steve to extend the cut in that direction be another half metre. It would also be useful to find out why there was a gap in the burnt layer. Helped by Andrew, the mottled layer was soon revealed but there was no sign of a pit which would have explained the gap in the burnt layer. By the end of the day Steve had managed to get down to the stony layer. It was early days but the stony layer seemed to continue in that direction (albeit at an angle towards the north). \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris spent some time cleaning the base of the clay-lined pit removing as much as he could of the blackish material from the bottom without damaging the base itself. Hopefully the dry weather will dry out the surface so that we’ll be able to understand what the base consists of. He later continued with the work on the embedded stones in the rising sandy clay mound. With this task he got help from Peter and Isabel. Andrew and Patrick meanwhile continued their work on the trenches (Sondage 1d.S1) either side of the box-like feature (F22) at the centre of curved large stone alignment. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thursday 25th June<\/strong>
Day 13
It was forecast to be hotter to day but a constant breeze blowing over the crest of the hill meant it wasn’t as bad as Tuesday. Still we only managed a small turnout with just Paul Langin and Alison joining Bill and Chris.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill explained to Paul the issues we were having re-digging Trench 1c. On Tuesday Bill had realised we hadn’t over cut the trench on the southwest side. Colin had taken out another 40cm of the fill but had left the soil in on that side just in case. When he left though he was confident it was part of the backfill. Bill asked Paul therefore to take it out and take the trench down until he reached an unexcavated level. This he achieved after lunch reaching the pure sandy clay we’d discovered when this trench was first dug. Looking at the section Bill realised something else – last year, to prove that the stones embedded in the brown sandy clay in the southeast end of Trench 3a, he had cut a small test pit in this trench to retrieve some of the stones for comparison (see 2025 Day 30). He recorded it as being about 4m from Peg 10a which is exactly where we were now, confirming the soil being the filled in test pit. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris meanwhile continued with the work Susan had been doing on the embedded stones in the rising central sandy clay mound on the northeast side of Feature F2. As he extended a cut on the northeast side he observed mottling in the soft sandy. \"\"
Chris had to leave soon after lunch but was able to carry out his drone survey before he left.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Alison arrived Bill got her to help him take some more height readings with the dumpy level – this time along the line of the sondages either side of Feature F22 so that he could draw this section when it is finally excavated. Later Bill asked Alison to recut the section through the rising central sandy clay mound on the southwest side of Feature F2. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 23rd June<\/strong>
Day 12
From the cold and wet to the hot and sticky, this week is going to be a challenge with temperatures reaching the mid 30s. Braving the conditions today with Bill and Chris were Andrew, Colin, Steve, Susan and for the first time this year Dave North.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill explained to Colin the problems we were having trying to resolve the complex layering in the previously dug Trench 1C. Both Bill and Chris had been checking the original recording of this trench when it was first dug (see 2023 blog Day 30) to see if it related to what we were now seeing. We both had detected a seemingly isolated dark patch. Also Bill had been assuming the re-digging of this trench had overcut the southwest section by 25cm. A check on his drawing however made him realise that it hadn’t been. What seem like the edge of the original trench exposed in the northwest section was just were a large sod had been inserted. To check this out Bill asked Colin to dig out another 40cm of backfill initially following the apparent edge just in case it was the edge. Colin had to leave soon after lunch but he was confident it wasn’t the edge, as the apparent plough soil was much deeper and softer than the plough soil in the ‘known to be true’ plough soil in the southwest section. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Steve meanwhile was given the task of cleaning up the extension to Trench 1b on the SW side that Chris Haws and Paul Wale opened up last week. This confirmed the extent of the stony layer stopping half way along the extension. It also showed the burning layer continued but there was a gap at which point the mottled clay layer stopped. On the other side of the gap the layer above the burning was more homogenous, similar to the extension in Trench 1e. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew continued working on the sondage on the northeast side of F22 (Sondage 1d.S1). He was able to take it down about 5cm into the underlying soft sandy clay. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris, Susan and Dave worked on the area around F2 (where our second urn was). Chris worked on the section Patrick looked on Day 4 (Sondage 3a.S5 Ext) removing the fill from the previously dug section. \"\"
Susan continued with her work on the embedded stones in the rising central sandy clay mound while Dave worked on the trench to the northeast side of F2. This was revealing the extent of the stones embedded in the rising central mound. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thursday 18th June<\/strong>
Day 11
Another great turnout, joining Bill, Chris and Patrick were Andrew, Jen, Isabel, Gaby, Paul Langin, Paul Wale and Chris Haws. Nice also to see Nicole Tunnicliffe joining us for the first time this year bringing with her new starter Bob Huddart (Bob is long-time chairman of Bury Archaeological Society). In the afternoon we had a visit from Society members Heather and Gordon Harrison, along with Heather’s brother-in-law John Davies. This time It was Chris who gave them the site tour. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We’ve being having problems trying to understand what is going on on the west side of the northwest edge of Trench 1b where the earlier Trench 1c cut through. Jen therefore, helped by Nicole continued trowelling through the stony layer there. Paul L and Bob were also tasked with cleaning up the stony layer further along the northwest edge so a clearer picture could be seen. At the east end the edge of the consolidated stony layer can clearly be seen. \"\" The stones are lying directly under the plough soil but, as we move further to the west, the standard arrangement of mottled clay on top of a thin band of burning develops. However as we get closer to Trench 1c, there is a gap in the stony layer before a higher layer of stones emerge with the burning seemingly sandwiched in it. It now seems clear that Trench 1c only went down as far as this stone layer so it is hoped a cut along the northwest edge would clarify the situation. Before removing all the stones, Nicole gave them a good cleaning, while Jen pursued the arc of burning and soft brown sandy clay discovered on Tuesday (producing a section offset from the intended section). \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul W and Chris H continued working on the southwest end of Trench 1b. Helped by Andrew they were asked to dig a 1m x 1m cut into its northwest edge in an attempt to chase the edge of the stony layer on that side. Soon after lunch Paul had to leave but before he did the pair had managed to get down through a thick layer of mottled clay onto the burning layer. Stones where just beginning to emerge on line with the edge already exposed but didn’t seem to continue all the way to the end of the trench (more to see next time out). \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Susan continued with her work on the embedded stones in the rising central sandy clay mound. She was helped by Gaby who worked on the the southeast section (in sondage 3a.S5 Ext) exposing more of the large stone block near the bottom of it which Patrick had started to work on last month. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick, Chris D and Andrew meanwhile continued the work on the trenches being cut around Feature F22 (the strange arrangement of stones at the centre of our stone circle feature). Andrew worked on the northeast side of the sondage (1d.S1), Chris in the middle southeast side and Patrick on the new area (1d.S2) on the southwest side. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill had left the dumpy tripod up so he asked Paul L to help him take some more heights (Tuesday’s figures had turned out to be to surprisingly accurate, being within centimetre of the readings he’d got in 2022 when the first survey of the central mound had been carried out). This had encouraged Bill to take more readings this time at the southeast edge of the central block containing Peg3a, so that he could set up a string line to record the section Alison had cleaned up on Tuesday. Paul helped Bill then to record this section. Bill also took a reading on the other side of this trench so that he could complete his drawing of this section which Alison had also cleaned up. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 16th June<\/strong>
Day 10
Great turnout today with 11 on site. Joining Bill, Chris and Patrick were Jen, Susan, Isabel, Emma, Alison, Colin and two new starters Paul Wale and Chris Haws. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before setting the the new starters Paul and Chris on their task for the day, Bill gave them the usual tour of the site. Once this was over Bill set them to work on the southwest side of the original Trench 1b. This hadn’t been looked at for a couple years and was getting overgrown. Their first task therefore was to clean it up and remove the build up of soil fallen in off the section. The reason for looking at this area was that there seemed to be a disconnect between the edge of the stony layer in this trench and the edge revealed in Trench 1e. We needed therefore to chase the edge by extending the southwest end of Trench 1b in the northwest direction. Before doing so we needed to re-establish the edge of the stony layer. After removing the vegetation and fallen in spoil the edge was clearly picked up and Paul and Chris did a great job in revealing once again the burning layer and a good depth of mottled clay. \"\" <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill got Emma going on the area she had been working on the last time she came i.e. the NW section of the extended Trench 1b – while Jen, helped by Isabel continued with the work on the southwest side of the section going into Trench 1c. Issy worked on the southwest section while Jen worked on the northwest side. Last week they had both worked on cutting a slot along the northwest face of this trench to reveal more of the section. The idea was to try to confirm if, as previously detected that the burning and mottled clay layers were diving down below a layer of stones embedded in a soft brown sandy clay layer. Confusing the issue was the previously dug and backfilled Trench 1c. After taking the cut down in this area it could be seen that the original trench had not removed the stony layer. It still wasn’t clear though what was happening to the burning layer. On the southwest section the picture was very confusing with the burning and mottled clay layers appearing and disappearing seemingly at random. Perplexingly an arc of burning and soft brown sandy clay was revealed lying below the orange soft sandy clay. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Things were a lot simpler in the adjacent Trench 1e where Andy had been working a couple of weeks before. He had cut a small extension to the northwest and taking it down layer by layer had revealed the burning layer as a small patch. This seemed to explain why this layer kept appearing a disappearing in the sections. Colin was tasked with taking his extension down to the next level. This reveal that there were no stones in it confirming that stony layer was turning to the north. It also revealed that the burning and mottled clay layers terminated at this point being replaced by a thick layer of soft brown sandy clay. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Susan continued to micro-excavate our clay-lined feature removing another section under the central partition. There was still some bone left under what was left of the partition but it was decided to leave it at this point and see if our osteologist Dr Sam Walsh would be happy with the amount he had retrieved. We have exposed enough of the base now to perhaps investigate its construction. \"\"Susan finished the day by transferring to the area around where Urn2 had been (F2), looking at the stones embedded in the rising central sandy clay mound. Understanding its build will help us with knowing the sequence of the whole site’s construction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alison meanwhile worked on the section on the northeast side of where our Urn1 had been that Jon worked on last time he was out. She was able to re-establish the burning layer and significantly the layer of whitish clay lying below it toward the southeast of the section. This had previously been seen when this trench was first excavated and recorded. \"\"Bill will now be able to finish his drawing of the section.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris and Patrick continued with their work around Feature F22 (the strange stone arrangement at the centre of our stone circle feature), Chris on the middle southeast side, Patrick on the new area on the southwest (1d.S2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before leave Bill and Emma set up the Dumpy Level and recorded levels along the section of Trench 1c. Bill had been recording this section using a string line but had been getting confusing results, so hopefully this method would resolve the issues he was getting. While he had the Dumpy set up, Patrick asked him if it could measure the angle between north (Blackrod Parish Church Tower) and the ‘Two Lads’ monument on top of Winter Hill. This is a stone cairn that can clearly be seen from our site and Patrick has a theory about its position to ours and the sun rise on the summer solstice. Although the Dumpy cannot measure angles accurately below one degree Patrick was delighted when Bill revealed the angle to be around 47 degrees which was precisely on the the summer solstice sun rise (the implication being that the ancients selected this position for or monument based on its alignment with the Two Lads monument).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wednesday 10th June<\/strong>
Day 9
Another rain affected day both braving the elements were Chris, Patrick, Jen, Alison, Jon and first time out this year Francesca Usher.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick and Alison marked out a new slot on the southwest side of Feature F22 (the strange arrangement of stones at the centre of our stone circle feature) to explore that side (we’ll call it Sondage 1d.S2). At the southwest end of the slot a dark patch (not burning) appeared. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jen and Francesca continued to work on the new slot along the NW edge of the extended Trench 1b. They were trying to find out if the red\/black line that we find all over the centre of the site ran above, or below the layers of stone they had exposed (as had been detected in Trench 1c when it was first exposed in 2023 – Day41). It seems to run above the stones, but more work is required to check this. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris and Jon headed to higher ground away from the waterlogged areas to the feature we discovered in 2024 just to the east of the site of Urn2 (which was removed last year and now in Bolton Museum Stores). This is an area of stones seemingly embedded in the rising sandy clay mound the urn was buried in. Jon carefully removed the material between the stones to show cavities lower down beneath them. \"\"Several layers of stone were revealed suggesting this feature could be a cairn. As these layers overlie the large stone block under the pit containing the burial (B9) and also under the position of Urn2, we should be able to determine a sequence of events here. \"\"Also if we can demonstrate that this feature is cairn, then the lower level must be sitting on a lower ground surface, which we may be able to project across the rest of the site (the original ground surface is something we have always been struggling to identify in the central area).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Over lunch, in addition to the usual drone survey of the site, Chris also undertook a drone survey of the field as crop marks from an old field boundary were visible on the ground. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 9th June<\/strong>
Day 8
Another dodgy week weather-wise and with Bill away, Chris was in charge. Joining him were Patrick, Jen and Isabel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jen and Issy were asked to cut a slot in front of the partially exposed section on the NW of the extended Trench 1b. As mentioned last week this section needs to be recorded as there is a significant change from one side to the other. After measuring and marking out the area they started in the centre, which was an area clear of stones. \"\"By the end of a rain affected day, they had found an edge of a patch of stones that were at angles rather than lying flat. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris and Patrick continued to work on the eastern and southern edge of Feature F22 (the strange arrangement of stones at the centre of our stone circle feature) to try to find both the sides of the stones and if they are in a pit. \"\"As it rained very heavily over lunch and the area was flooded, Chris and Patrick removed some of the top smaller stones on the eastern side. The exercise was recorded on video so that the position of each stone could be recorded. This exposed the large block (see last week) which looked as if it had at some point moved away from the side of the collection of stones. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thursday 4th June<\/strong>
Day 7
Not a great day weather-wise today with a constant drizzle all morning – just thankful that we had the tent which was just about surviving the gusting wind (although needing some maintenance from time to time). Braving the elements today with Bill, Chris and Patrick were Andrew, Susan and Paul Langin – and also new starter Emma Porter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After giving Emma the obligatory site tour, Bill gave her the task of cleaning up the northwest end of Trench 1b. At some point this will be extended to find out the extent of the stony layer on this side of the central area. \"\"Before that though, the section needs to be recorded as there is a significant change from one side to the other. On the northeast side there is no sign of the mottled clay layer and only sparse indications of the burning layer. \"\"Whereas on the southwest side, the mottled layer is clearly evident – in fact gets to be quite a thick layer by the time it reaches Trench 1e. In the area around Trench 1d however the story become complicated as we have the issue of the ‘soft brown sandy clay layer embedded with stones’ layer. As mentioned last time out, the high level of the stones here might mean the burning layer is running underneath it. As cut therefore along this section should hopefully help us to understand what’s going on here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bill carried on digging out the sondage in Trench 1c looking for the base of the soft sandy clay layer. When Paul arrived, he took over and was able to reach a harder, stonier layer. However, as has been the case in other sondages looking for the base, it didn’t prove to be particularly definitive. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew continued with his work in Trench 1e. His first task was to cut a sondage on the southwest side to see how deep the underlying soft sandy clay was. This revealed it to be very similar in depth and nature to the sondage Bill and Paul had dug in Trench 1c. It also showed that the brown sandy clay in the corner, although cutting through the burning layer, did not extend into the soft sandy clay below. To understand what was going on in the opposite corner, it was decided to extend the trench in the northwest direction by another half metre. \"\"The mottled and brown sandy clay was recorded and various levels. \"\"Reaching the burning layer, revealed it to be an isolated patch. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris continued his work on Sondage 1d.S1 next to Feature F22, extending it this time towards the northwest. This revealed a compacted stony area on the edge of the feature and a large stone angling down into it. Patrick joined Chris working on the southeast side of the feature. This revealed a thin brown patch running away from it. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Susan carried on working on our clay-lined feature, eventually reaching the stony base. It’s difficult to determine the nature of the base at the moment, whether it’s one solid stone or a collection of stones. There is definitely a stone poking through on the west side. The base also seems to be rising on the south side, also most bowl shaped (could it be ceramic? surely not). Once the rest of the bone is remove, a proper examination of the base can be carried out. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 2nd June<\/strong>
Day 6
Excavations were rapidly reorganised for today due to the ever changing forecast, still though we had a decent turnout. Joining Bill and Chris were Andrew, Susan, Jon and Jen Harrison (making her first appearance this year).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There was still a lot to do on the original Trench 1c section before Bill could get it properly recorded. One of the issues was the depth of the underlying soft sandy clay and with this in mind, Bill started a sondage (where Phil had been working last week) to check this out. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jen meanwhile worked at the northwest end of it (where Isabel and John N had been working last week) to see if she could clarify what was going on. Bill had previously recorded a layer of stones embedded in soft brown sandy clay, which overlay the mottled and burning layers that disappeared below it. After a good cleaning it still wasn’t clear if this was true. \"\"Confusing the issue was that the original Trench 1c had been backfilled and it wasn’t clear if the stones exposed were in situ or in fact part of backfill. \"\"Also the stony layer recently uncovered next to this trench where noticeably higher and it was thought that they may actually be the embedded stones previously recorded (the only way to check this out would be a section along the northwest edge of this trench.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Andrew continued with his work in the adjacent trench (Trench 1e) – showing his ability to multitask. \"\"It is pretty clear now that we have the edge of the stony layer but the mottled clay and burning layers continue. \"\"However there are unexplained gaps in these layers in both corners of the trench where brown sandy clay replaced the usual lighter mottled clay. In fact the is also a gap in the northeast section which (gratifyingly for Bill) corresponds with the gap he had recorded on the other side in Trench 1c (which he’d not been able to detect this time) showing it to be some sort of linear feature. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jon was tasked with cleaning up the trench where Urn1 had been so that the section previously recorded could be brought up to date now that the Urn had been removed. He was urged to be particularly careful where the vessel had been to check if there was evidence of the pit dug for it. After careful cleaning, only a shadow of where the pot had been could be detected. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris continued his work on the sondage (1d.S1) next to F22 (our possible cist or stone box feature Ben Dyson has recommended we call it – maybe best to just call it strange arrangement of stones at the centre of our stone circle feature). Chris was detecting a possible pit cut for the feature so he extended the trench further to the southeast, showing that it continued in that direction. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Susan meanwhile continued with her work on our clay-lined feature (F4). She had reached the point where a decision had to be made about the internal partition. The cremated bone spread a long way under it reaching almost to the side wall on the northwest side. Even if all the bone could be removed without touching the partition, the partition would be so weak it is likely it would survive for very long. It was decided therefore to remove it, or at least part of it to see it if as much of it as possible could be retained. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thursday 28th <\/strong>May
Day 5
This day was added to compensate for the short day on Tuesday. Despite the short notice however, there was a decent turnout. Joining Chris and Patrick were Susan, Alison, Paul Kenyon, Paul Langin and for his first visit of the season Steve Parry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Susan continued with her work on the clay-lined pit feature (F4), extracting the final layer of bones (spit 4) from the westside chamber. However, it has now become clear that this last collection of bones is running under the partition that splits the feature. This is useful in that it strongly suggests that the partition was added later than the burial, but does pose problems as to how we extract the final collection of bones without disturbing it. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick continued cleaning up the section of embedded stones created when the sondage (3a.S5 Ext.) was dug 2 years ago (adjacent to the location of Urn 2 lifted last year). We can now see that there are several stacked layers of stone built up from the large rock slab at the bottom. Patrick also took advantage of the hot weather, which has at last dried out the bottom of the section, to remove the plastic sheeting exposing the lowest layer. This seemed to be a stone-free darker sandy clay with possibly some flecks of charcoal. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris continued with the work on the slot (Sondage 1d.S1) to the east of the stone box feature (F22). So far there is no view of the east side of the box, but at the end of the day finally a possible edge of a stone filled pit came into view. It now looks that a pit has been dug, filled with small stones around the outside which support the larger upright stone that make up the stone box shape. Now the edge of the pit is visible, it can be followed to learn more about the construction of this feature. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul K continued the work he began on Wednesday cleaning the section of Trench 1c (originally dug in 2023) taking the floor down a further couple of centimetres. There were indications of dark material that looked like charcoal but more likely shale. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Alison, Paul L and Steve cleaned up the stony layer in the area that had been de-turfed on previous sessions on the NW side of Trench 1b. Steve worked on the section next to Trench 1d \"\"while Paul and Alison worked on the other side next to Trench 1c. \"\"This allowed Chris to do a drone survey over lunch so that in the afternoon they could start removing the stony layer covering to see if there were any significant features underneath. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ideal light conditions persuaded Chris to attempt two drone surveys. However the very strong wind blowing from the east meant the 5m height survey failed but the second survey at 14m height was successful. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wednesday 27th <\/strong>May
Day 4
Great turnout today with 13 eager volunteers on site. Joining Bill, Chris and Patrick were Andrew, Isabel, Paul Kenyon, Paul Langin, Gerald Conn – and some familiar faces from last year including Phil Livesey, John Needle, Jon Shelley, Gaby Bamford and Susan Rimmer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First job was to clear up the mess the strong wind had wreaked over night (which wasn’t predicted) on the tent and gazebo. Perhaps a mistake to leave the gazebo up (although it was on its last legs) but surprised the tent had once again suffered a fractured pole section. Phil and Andrew though, gratefully were able to fashion a temporary repair.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was great to see so many on site – it enabled us to open up more areas for us to investigate, particularly in our pursuit of the extent of the stony layer on the NW side. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jon and Paul L set about extending a section away from Trench 1d further towards the datum Peg 10c, in and attempt to chase the edge of the consolidated stony layer. Early days but it seems the stony layer keeps going in the NW direction.\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Isabel meanwhile was tasked with cleaning the newly opened area next to Trench 1c while John N continues clearing out the backfill from Trench 1c. Confusingly undisturbed stones started to appear on the SW side but then we realised the trench has grown slightly since last opened. As he neared to bottom, areas of burning began to emerge which corresponded the same thing we’d seen when this trench was first opened i.e. the burning and mottled clay layers dipping down below a layer of stones embedded in a soft brown sand clay. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To confirm this, Trench 1c would need to be extended towards the SW which would mean loosing the section. Bill had previously recorded this however when the trench was first opened but his drawing needed to be updated. With this in mind, he asked Phil and Paul K to clean the section up, Phil starting at the end next to the crossing Trench 1b (SW side) while Paul worked on the section from the large stone to where John was working (including the cut for going towards Trench 1e). \"\"
When finish Bill was able to record the depth of the stony layer along its full length. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile Andrew and Gerald worked on expanding Trench 1e in a NW direction (using the newly cut turfs to block up the original Trench 1e which was devoid of stones). When the got down below the mottled clay layer, which is quite substantial here, stones began to appear but early days to say if an edge had been reached. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of Ben’s suggestions was that we should investigate the stones on the east side of the central sandy clay mound. Unlike the stones on the west side which seem to be acting as a revetment on top of the mound, these stones are deeply embedded in it. Patrick therefore started by cleaning up the section created when the sondage (3a.S5 Ext.) was cut into it (revealing a large stone at its base just SE of the burial found under Urn2). Meanwhile Susan and Gaby where given the task of micro-excavating the contents of our clay-lined pit feature (F4). \"\"
Susan and Gaby made good progress with a package of cremated bone exposed right next to the mysterious central partition. \"\"\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tuesday 26th <\/strong>May
Day 3
Heatwave this week – mid-day temps reaching 350<\/sup> so we decided to have just a morning session. Braving the conditions today were Bill, Peter, Patrick and Isabel Vaudrey (we were tempted to cancelled the whole day but Peter was going to be off on his hols – so he needed to catch up with Bill and Patrick on our bid for NLHF grant we has been working on before he went).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite the heat, we did managed to make some progress on the areas started last week. Bill’s first job though was to set up the gazebo to provided a bit shade – the tent proving no use for this as it was like an oven inside. Isabel worked on the area next to Trench 1d that Paul L and Gerald had started last Thursday. By cleaning the stones she was able to reveal a clear edge to the consolidated stony layer wandering into Trench 1d. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Peter continued with the work of trowelling down the sondage (now labelled 1d.S1) on the NE side of F22. This revealed more of the mottling in the soft sandy clay but most striking was the development of a patch of brown soft sandy clay on the NE side of it. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Patrick had a quick look at the condition of the burial under where our second urn had been and assessed how we were going to tackle the embedded stones to the south of it. Bill had brought his drone and before leaving was able to take some aerial shots to record the current condition of the site. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thursday 21th <\/strong>May
Day 2
Good turn out today with Chris and Peter joining Bill and Andrew and also two new starters Paul Langin and Gerald Conn. Alison also came later, as did Paul Kenyon with Derek Winstanley (former chair of Wigan Local History and Heritage Society) – Derek came just to have a look around and Bill was able to give them all a tour of the site.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul K had to leave early and when Derek left, Paul Langin and Gerald were keen to start digging, so they were give the task of extending Trench 1b on the NW side. The area selected for them was next to the previously excavated Trench 1d that had previously been backfilled. The task was made easier with the area having had its top soil partially removed by Nick the farmer when moving the spoil heap back for us. This particular area would hopefully reveal more of the edge between consolidated stony layer and stony scatter laying beyond it. There is very little mottled layer if any here, so they quite quickly came down onto the stony layer. More cleaning needed though if an edge is to be discerned. \"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile Alison and Andrew continued with the task of extending Trench 1b on the side next to the previously backfilled Trench 1c (started yesterday). There is a depth on mottled clay here which Chris recorded before trowelling through it to expose the stony layer below. Bill also joined them to remove the backfill from Trench 1c. The drawings that records this trench show a gap in the stony layer but the mottled clay and burnt layers continue before diving under a brown soft sandy clay that had stones embedded in it. These stones Bill thinks are the ones that have a greenish tinge to them, found also in Trench 3b on the extreme SE side and Trench 10 on the east side. As he dug, some of these stones turned up in the backfill from the trench.\"\" It will be interesting to see how the stony layer continues on the SW side of this trench.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of Ben Dyson’s suggestions from the previous day was how to tackle F22 (our possible cist or stone box as perhaps it should be called). This was to open up a trench to the side of it, starting from the inner edge of the perceived stone kerb and working our way towards the feature. This would allow the feature’s depth to be understood without removing any of the stones from it (thus retaining the structure). It would also inform the nature of the soft sandy clay that the stony layer and large stones are sat on. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

With this in mind Chris and Peter laid out a sondage on the NE side of the feature on the line of the datum points Bill had put in the previous day. Trowelling down the few centimetres revealed a mottling in the soft sandy clay which suggests it not to be natural.\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wednesday 20th <\/strong>May
Day 1
Late start this season due to various commitments our leaders have had this year. On site today raring to get going we’re Bill, Chris and Andrew with joining later in the morning Patrick and Paul Kenyon. We were also joined by Ben Dyson from GMAAS who we had invited to help us with how to tackle the two potentially sensitive areas i.e. the possible cist features in both the central sandy clay mound (F11) and the newly discovered ring kerb (F22). For location of these features see our plan drawing here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris and Patrick had been on site the previous day to remove the covers and check out how it had survived the winter. Bill’s first job was to set up the tent as showers were predicted but find a spot on our newly reduced area wasn’t easy (spoil heap location was also going to be a problem and we may have to ask Nick to enlarge our fenced off area.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At our committee meeting earlier this month we set out our aims and priorities for the coming season, one of which was to investigate these features and agreed we would need professional advice as they may contain the primary burials of the monument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ben spent some time talking us through how he would approach the task and after he left Chris made a start on the F22. His first task was to remove the loose stones to see if the feature had a solid floor. This revealed more stones going down but still wasn’t clear if he’d reached the bottom.\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One of the aims mentioned at the meeting was to establish the extent of the stony layer on the north and northwest side. Not necessarily the highest priority but certainly something that could be started straight away. Andrew and Paul were given the task of extending Trench 1b on its NW side on the side next to the previously excavated Trench 1c (which had previously been backfilled).\"\"<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Despite our late start on site, work has been continuing at the Bolton Archive facility. As mentioned last year all our cremated bone material, urns and pit fill has been sent to the facility. It has been worked on (employing a process of cleaning, washing and drying) and a batch was sent over to Dr Sam Walsh at the University of Lancashire (B10 from the F13 pit). As reported in our Newsletter No.284<\/a>, the result back from Sam were quite spectacular with almost 70% of the bone fragments being identified. Included in the assemblage were teeth and pieces of petrous (sections of the skull) which enabled the person to be identified as a young adult (but not enough to estimate the sex). As reported in our Newsletter No.287<\/a> a second batch from the contents of Urn1 is also ready to go. This could potentially be even more interesting, as the the process of micro-excavation enabled us to record in detail the distribution of the bone and pyre material in the Urn. Hopefully this will give us an insight into the ancient\u2019s burial practices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Thursday 2nd JulyDay 15Another great turnout with Andrew, Peter, Jen, Isabel, Gaby, Alison, Jon Shelley and John Needle joining Bill and Chris. We also had Gabriel and his mum Denise joining us for the second day of his two-day work … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4822","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4822"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4964,"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4822\/revisions\/4964"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}