![\"GPR](\"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/GPR-Chimney-Base.jpg\")
<\/a>By the time I’d finished the tour, a\u00a010m x 10m survey next to the chimney base had been\u00a0competed – and the results were very encouraging. At a depth of between 25cm and 75cm, a linear feature was detected\u00a0projecting in a southeast direction away from the base. Could this be the chimney flue we have been looking for. In the south corner of our survey area there also seems to be a very distinct are of disturbance at a depth of about a metre. This may be rubble but could also be the remains of the the furnace connected with the chimney. Both these features would make\u00a0great\u00a0targets for future investigations if we get chance to dig their again. The group were very impressed with our\u00a0archaeology and were keen to understand more of the history of the site. (may have even encouraged one or two to join us in the future).![\"Guided](\"https:\/\/www.wiganarchsoc.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Guided-Tour.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\nDate: 6th November 2015<\/p>\n
This Friday afternoon session was organised to coincide with the Wildlife Trust’s field workshop. Myself and Andy had half a dozen or so volunteers from the Friends of Kirkless to help us with our tasks. Both Cheryl Knott and Sue Lonsdale from the Trust were on hand to coordinate activities and soon got tuck in with a\u00a0bush cutter to clear the southeast end of the southwest concrete wall. On each previous visit we had attempted to clear this end but the brambles had always defeated us and there was even some doubt whether the end had survived at all. The clearance proved successful and the end of the wall was shown to be in good condition. Date: 11th October 2015<\/p>\n Best turnout so far (nine in all including Darren, Andy, Neil, Eric, Ben, myself, two students from Winstanley A Level College (Jennifer and Fin) and young Robert from Whelley). With so many hands available we were able to make some headway on opening up more of the chimney base. At the other end of the SW brick\u00a0wall Darren was\u00a0tasked with confirming the SE termination point (which Ben thought he detected in July). In the meantime Neil and I looked for evidence of a\u00a0weighbridge which was reported in the same\u00a0area by one of the local residence. Unfortunately the end of the day was marred by a group of youths who were determined to cause bother for us. I don’t think, however, these are typical of the local children who in general have shown interest in what we have been doing.<\/p>\n Date: 13th September 2015<\/p>\n Only three of us this week (me, Darren and Andy). First job was to clear the site of beer cans (looks like late night parties have been held in honor\u00a0of\u00a0our excavations). \u00a0This job completed, Darren concentrated on opening up the circular\u00a0area at the centre of the chimney base to establish its\u00a0shape. Inside this area the brick pattern square instead of radial – does this circular area represent the internal diameter of the chimney? If so it would have been 1.84 metres diameter. Date: 23rd August 2015<\/p>\n Holidays and bad weather has meant we have only just been able to get back on site but at least the rain has given the exposed brickwork of the chimney base a good cleaning (just four of us today myself, Andy, Darren and Patrick). Date: 12th July 2015<\/p>\n Good turnout this week (myself, Andy, Darren, Neil and new volunteer Ben). After explain the site to Ben, both he and Darren set off to see if they could establish the extent of the southwest wall we uncovered last week in Test Pit 5. It looked as if the wall turned a corner at this point but further digging by Darren revealed that it was just a recess for the stanchions. \u00a0 In the meantime the rest of us were busy looking for evidence of a small isolated building shown on the 1922 map to the southwest of the southwest wall. The vegetation is sparse in this area and probing indicates solid structure just below the surface. But is this the building or demolition debris. More to the northwest the sparse vegetation develops into shallow promontory. \u00a0A spade in the thin turf quickly revealed in-situ brick work which to fall away to the northeast. The end of the wall was soon exposed consisting of \u00a0series of steps going down at least 7 courses. On close inspection the wall was obviously curved suggesting a circular structure. This could only mean one thing \u00a0– the base of a chimney. Date: 4th July 2015<\/p>\n Just three of us today (myself, Andy and Patrick). However we did manage to find the end of the wall we uncovered\u00a0on our last visit, just short of the footpath. Unfortunately it didn’t have a return to it. It just seemed to peter out, therefore we are still not sure which side the building was on (or if it was a building at all). There is hard compacted material on either side and it also lies under a compacted layer suggesting it was an earlier phase which was abandoned and covered over. Some of the bricks were obviously reused firebricks – stamped with HALL STOURBRIDGE- a company in the West Midlands which was still going up to 2008. This week we also had a look at the brick wall which bounds the site on the southwest side. It is exposed to a height of \u00a0about 1.5 metres in\u00a0the middle near to where we found the end of the concrete wall. However,\u00a0going northwest, it disappears into the undergrowth. The high terrace remains \u00a0all the way to the footpath on the extreme west side but when Patrick put a trench across it, could find no sign of the brick wall – however patches of concrete exposed on the terrace indicates that parts of the factory existed in this area. The footpath on the extreme west side does run over a thick brick wall but on examination this appears to be an isolated structure. Date: 21st June 2015<\/p>\n Four again this weekend (myself, Andy, Darren and Neil). Having established the full extent of the pavement building in our Trench 1, we decided to look at how much of the Steel Works had survived on the northeast side. It was becoming clear speaking to local residence that major landscaping had taken place in the 1980’s with huge swaths of the site being bulldozed away. This had resulted with a depression in this area where he expected the factory to be \u00a0and also the pond on the east side. To find the extent of the destruction, on our last visit, Patrick had started a trench (Test Pit 4) on the edge of what appeared to be the hard surface of the factory floor. This week Darren continued with this trench, persevering in difficult conditions between the tree root and, although not very impressive, it seems like we have found the raggedy edge of the destruction in this area lying about 8.5 metres to the northeast of\u00a0the pavement. <\/p>\n Date: 7th June 2015<\/p>\n Four of us this weekend (myself, Andy, Darren and Patrick) – although Neil also paid a visit later with his dodgy ankle (providing a supervisory\u00a0roll). Our first task was to establish the extent of the walling which encloses he pavement on each side. We know it\u00a0extends\u00a0towards the southwest but not how much. In both cases it turned out to be not very far and\u00a0there does not appear to be any interconnecting wall an the southwest side. This suggests that building would have been open on this side. We also opened up the opposite end\u00a0of the southeast wall which showed\u00a0that it was very similar to the north corner of the northwest wall having a small detached brick plinth. This is suggestive of a support for some sort of structure on the northeast side of the building.\u00a0 Date: 30th May 2015<\/p>\n With quite a good turnout today\u00a0(myself, Ken and Andy with Patrick and Eric joining in the afternoon) we were able to make\u00a0some good progress.\u00a0 However as we uncover more of the brick pavement, the more complex it seems to get.\u00a0 It\u2018s clear though that this pavement feature represents\u00a0a standalone platform, as it is surrounded on three sides by brick walls with perhaps an entrances on the southeast and northwest sides. Date: 17th May 2015<\/p>\n Just four of us to start with this week (Darren, Andy, Ken and myself) but Patrick and Neil (with his sore ankle) joined us in the afternoon. Darren and Ken concentrated on the brick pavement while Andy and I endeavoured to find the northwest end of the southwest wall. This proved to be quite difficult as the overburden was getting deeper the further west we went. Eventually we decided to jump a meter or so to a point where the ground fell away. It was obvious here that the wall must end and sure enough our test pit revealed a termination of the concrete. It wasn’t straight forward however as the end of the wall had broken away digging further west proved that the wall did not continue any further. Meanwhile Darren and Ken (and later Patrick) were busy uncovering more of the pavement giving the later brick fill area more definition. They also began to show that in the four corners of the brick fill area were the cut-off stubs of iron tie-bars. This suggests some large machinery or structure may have originally occupied this position. The surface of the later brick fill area also showed signs of mortar indicating that a later structure was located here. We also extended the\u00a0main trench (trench 1) north eastward to see if we could find the extent\u00a0of the pavement in that direction. We reached what appeared to be a termination but we’ll need to extend the trench t confirm it. Date: 26th April 2015<\/p>\n On site for about 10.00am for our first dig on the site of Kirkless Steelworks. Just 6 of us today\u00a0(Shaun, Andy, Christine, Darren, myself \u00a0and Patrick who joined later). After reading and signing the risk assessment form, we set about\u00a0uncovering what we understood to be the remains of the steelworks. Christine and Darren were given the job of looking at the brick pavement on the north west side of the site, while Andy and Shaun were tasked with uncovering the south west wall which we surveyed last visit. This proved\u00a0to be quite a challenge\u00a0due to the dense undergrowth of bramble on the south side, however Shaun made good progress\u00a0with his machete and even discovered\u00a0the stub ends of the buildings stanchions on the inside (north side) of the concrete wall. Andy also found it\u00a0heavy going at the other end of the wall because of the thick layer of compacted sods\u00a0it was buried under.<\/p>\n In the meantime Christine was also struggling with the sods overlaying the brick pavement, but it was already clear that there were two styles at this location. This seems to\u00a0indicate two stages, the earliest nearest the camera (presumably as its\u00a0toward\u00a0the centre of the building). These bricks have been laid end on and have a glazed surface suggesting reuse, perhaps from a former furnace. The later bricks seem to be infilling a gap and are\u00a0made from plain red bricks laid flat. Throughout the day we had visitors asking what we were up to including a party brought round by Mark Champion as part of a Open Day guided tour of the site. The Open Day had been arranged to celebrate the official designation of the site as a Local Nature Reserve which includes areas on both sides of the canal. All in all the day day was a great success with many people interested in the site and what we were doing. Hopefully this will encourage more volunteers.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Date: 11th April 2015<\/p>\n Last year\u00a0we presented our Project Plan to the Council for their approval. Last month our ‘Licence to Dig’ finally arrived and, with our Insurance now in place, we are ready to start the project. With this in mind, last Saturday we met once again with Mark Champion and Sue Lonsdale from the Wildlife Trust and some members of the Friends of Kirkless. The idea was to go over the site and identify areas where we could do the work (with such a sensitive site,\u00a0it was important to\u00a0make this\u00a0clear). \u00a0Mark, however, seemed to be more flexible (although he did say he indented being around when we start so he might change his mind\u00a0when the flowers start to appear).<\/p>\n We also took the opportunity to start surveying some of the features that are already visible (we are using the Iron Block\u00a0as our datum point).<\/p>\n The surveyed features are in green and, as you can see, the bottom wall isn\u2019t that far off – the next wall is actually spot on (although not the wall we thought it was). The pavement though (top left) doesn\u2019t make a lot of sense yet.<\/p>\n We\u2019re planning our next visit for Sunday 26rh April when we will be starting excavating.<\/p>\n Date: 6th June 2014<\/p>\n We met with Mark Champion today on site to look at the areas we plan to do some work and to discuss guiding principles for our excavations. Mark said he needed to be sure there would be minimum impact on sensitive areas. However he said he would be happy to leave the selection of specific areas to us as long as we avoiding digging where the vegetation is thin or where there is a range of species growing. Mark indicated he would allow some flexibility but would need to be consulted before we commenced. Also any spoil from the excavations would need to be placed on sheeting so that it can be retained for back-filling, or, if a feature is to be left exposed, then the soil can be dispersed in discreet locations on the site. A soon as I get chance I will put together a project plan for the work which Mark will be able to present to Wigan Council who have final say on what we can do.<\/p>\n Date: 30th March 2014<\/p>\n Another great day for our site visit.\u00a0On our previous visit we had used both the theodolite and modified dumpy level at each of our two stations to obtain duplicate results which we could then compare for accuracy. \u00a0The results, as \u00a0you can see, match pretty well and now we have a revise the overlay drawing with some confidence in its accuracy. This turned out not to be as easy as it had seemed on paper as trees and humps and hollows were set to thwart us at every turn. Eventually, however, we managed to locate most of the points around the steel works and lo and behold walling and brick pavement seemed to line up with our points. For the first time we will be able to say for certain what all the humps, bumps and bits of walls in the landscape are. We now need to produce a project plan to determine where excavations would be fruitful.<\/p>\n Before we left, Dave and I went over to where the\u00a0boiler house was\u00a0indicated on the map. It soon became apparent however that excavation here would be very difficult as there appeared to be large amounts of dumped material – and where the original ground level did appear, it seemed to be made up of demolition debris – \u00a0so probably best to stick with the steel works site.<\/p>\n Date: 9th March 2014<\/p>\n First chance to get out to the site after all the rain we’ve had this year – and it turned out to be a beautiful day (quite different than this time last year when our first attempt had to be abandoned due to the cold). Repeating the survey we finally managed last year but this time using the plane table with a modified dumpy level (the alidade worked but because the distance were so great, accuracy wasn’t as good). The modified dumpy swiveled on a plastic plug at the datum point and a pointer attached at the front gave us the positions in a similar way as the alidade. \u00a0 Date: 27th September 2013<\/p>\n Met on site with Mark Champion from the Lancashire Wild Life Trust. The purpose was to discuss the possibilities of further work following on from the survey we carried out in April.\u00a0As we walked over the site, Mark was keen to point out some of the unique features in the landscape which had developed due to its past industrial activity. Slag from the blast furnaces has produced an alkaline-rich soil. This, together with the slightly saline coal waste, has resulted in a habitat that is reminiscent of remote areas of the south coast of Britain. Grasses normally found on seaside dunes, water plants not native to these parts and rare flowers, all make this quite a remarkable landscape.<\/p>\n However Mark was not averse to us carrying out some excavation. He highlighted a number of areas where he thought digging would do little or no damage to the ecology.\u00a0 In fact Mark was quite keen in trying to understand the site himself. The next thing we need to do is to\u00a0develop a project plan to present to the council (the present land owner). Mark thinks that with his approval, getting permission should not be a problem. It would be quite something for us to uncover structures from this site which has such a significant industrial heritage.<\/p>\n Date: 7th April 2013<\/p>\n This was our second site visit \u00a0(an earlier attempt the last week was abandoned due to the bitterly cold weather). This time we were able to establish two stations on Rabbit Rocks 200 metres apart. Using our new plane table surveying equipment, we proceeded\u00a0to survey various features in the landscape. Here is our Site Diary detailing our activities on the Kirkless site – as usual with a blog, need to scroll down to the bottom to get the earliest entries. Date: 22nd November 2015 Today was the Heritage Walk day … Continue reading <\/a>In the meantime one volunteer helped Andy to plan the extent off our excavation of the chimney base – while other volunteers helped with our search of the northwest end of the southwest brick wall. Our previous visit had shown that the wall continued beyond the stanchion discovered in September. Extending the trench dug by Eric last month showed that the brick wall showed no sign of ending.<\/a>In fact a test pit 1 metre further along proved that the wall continues even beyond this point – albeit at some depth (about 1 metre). Further to the northwest the ground becomes very compacted and so we may not be able to find the end of this wall.<\/a>Despite this set back I’m sure the volunteers got a lot out the day and we plan to carry out another session later in the month.<\/p>\n<\/a>The theory being\u00a0that the ‘eye’ of the chimney (i.e. where the smoke came in) may still be detectable in the base (if it came in low down it would have been in the form an arch). <\/a>Unfortunately nothing of this nature could be detected despite us clearing enough\u00a0of the chimney’s centre area. What it did reveal however was that at just one course lower down, the circular area\u00a0pattern is strangely much larger (if this pattern defines the internal diameter then maybe there was a change of design during its construction). <\/a>Meanwhile Eric was tasked with opening up the NW end of the SW wall section Andy\u00a0uncovered last month. Our hope was that this would reveal the termination point of this wall, particularly with there being a stub end of a stanchion at this point. <\/a>Unfortunately for us more of the wall was uncovered\u00a0running beyond the stanchion proving that this wasn’t the\u00a0end of the wall (more work needed).<\/p>\n<\/a>Ben’s termination point turned out not to be so as the wall continues beyond this point disappearing under a layer of concrete, the same concrete which Neil and I had detected further on). Despite these setbacks however we have now been able to establish quite a long section of this wall which appears to be strangely contrary to the profile show on the early maps. A suggestion is that the map indicates the roof profile which probably protruded beyond the floor boundary (which is also suggested by the aerial photo).<\/p>\n<\/a>Meanwhile I tried to uncover the stepped brickwork at the southwest end of the trench. This prove to be very difficult with\u00a0the compacted rubble resisting both spade and mattock – I managed only to extend the trench just\u00a0a few more terraces before having to give up.<\/a>I thought it more fruitful to\u00a0join\u00a0Andy who was tasked with trying to find the NW end of the SW brick wall we had previously discovered in\u00a0Test Pit 5. This also proved very difficult as the soil here was very compacted and with stone inclusions, preventing the spade from penetrating to\u00a0any\u00a0depth. After hacking for a while at the overburden\u00a0with little progress\u00a0we decided to see we could skip a metre or two. This put us in the area where Patrick had previously investigated\u00a0without success. However this time we could detect a thin\u00a0fissure in the soil similar to one we had seen in Test Pit 5\u00a0between\u00a0the face of the brick wall and the soil itself.<\/a>Sure enough brickwork\u00a0began to appear and this time it displayed foundation courses or plinth with a curved edge – and on the northwest side, at last, signs of the end of this wall with a single stub end of an stanchion found protruding from the ground. The soil here is much softer so I’m sure on our next visit we will be able to confirm this one way or another.<\/p>\n<\/a>First job was to establish the actual size of the base so the trench was extended until the southwest end appeared. The brickwork at this end has survived in better condition therefore the last course of bricks before it begins to step down is still intact. This is not the case at the other end where damage has occurred, probably during the demolition process, resulting 5\u00a0courses being chamfered away. <\/a>This has made it difficult to measure precisely the diameter of the top of the base but our best estimate is that it is 7.9m (26ft) \u00a0in diameter. While we were uncovering the base, Andy busied \u00a0himself getting to the bottom of the stepped brickwork on the northeast side.<\/a> After 7\u00a0courses he eventually reached the bottom which seem to consist of a concrete plinth. That makes the base a total of 12 courses high (each brick is 83mm plus 10mm of concrete makes the base 93×12 = 1.1m high (3ft 8in) high).<\/p>\n<\/a>The extent of the wall toward the northwest is still undetermined despite the efforts of Darren and myself. Ben however, persevering in difficult conditions under the trees, finally exposed what seems to be the southeast end of the wall. A tape measure from our baseline confirmed that\u00a0the end\u00a0coincides with the northwest end of the concrete wall we discovered in Test Pit 1 at the end of May.<\/a>Ben’s wall however is not continuous as a big lump of concrete cuts across it for some reason.<\/p>\n<\/a>Chasing the brickwork towards the centre of the structure we soon realised that the chimney was a big one. The centre was\u00a0represented by a circular area, from which we could measure the radius. This turned out to be 4.7m which makes the base 9.4m (or 30 foot) in diameter which is huge.<\/a>Study of the 1920’s aerial photo\u00a0shows\u00a0a large chimney in this area. This must be the one\u00a0we have found\u00a0which\u00a0is great news because at last we have a feature with which we can confirm the location of the steelworks.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>They speciallised in making firebricks for the Glass Industry but their main trade was making fireboxes of Steam Railway Locomotives in the mid to late 19th century.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>We decided, therefore, to chase the exposed brick wall from its middle position, in a northwest direction. After\u00a0about 11 metres we came across a return or corner but it was’tn clear whether this was the end of the building or just a recess. Two adjacent upright stanchions (one bent over) suggest the end of a building but further investigations will be\u00a0needed to confirm this.<\/a>Some fun and games with the local scallies this week running off with our ranging poles\u00a0and\u00a0wheel barrow though we managed\u00a0to retrieve them – the wheel barrow from the slag heaps on the other side of the landfill\u00a0site.<\/p>\n<\/a>\u00a0All along this edge it appears that destruction debris has been deliberately deposited to form a bank (maybe to protect the edge from people fall off). Towards the northwest side the bank eventually disappears and the depression get shallower. It was here that we decided to put in another trench (Trench 2) to see if we could find the northwest extent of the site. Luckily our first spade went in on another brick wall which we chased in both directions. It seemed to be running parallel with the northeast wall of our\u00a0pavement in Trench 1, offset by 14 metres to the northeast. We couldn’t find the extent of it because of the debris bank on the south side and the path on the north. However, as it lies more than 28 metres to the northwest of the pavement, it suggests the site site was much bigger than we had anticipated on this side.<\/a>The highlight of our visit this week however was the refreshments provided by Darren – i.e. hot tea accompanied by a bacon butty.<\/p>\n<\/a>\u00a0Some of the bricks in the wall on the northeast side of the pavement where found to have an inscription stamped into them. Intially\u00a0this was difficult to read but later turned out to be GLENBOIG.\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0The Glenboig Union Fireclay Co. Ltd operated in the mid 19th century producing world renown fire bricks and refractory ceramics from their factory in North Lanarkshire. This is more evidence that this building was constructed from reused furnace material.<\/p>\nOne suggestion is that it was a loading bay. It seems apparent that the bricks in the middle, which are laid flat, form a plinth, designed to support a piece of heavy machinery such as a jib crane. The remnants of large iron tie-bolts support this theory. The bricks here are much stronger than the surrounding bricks which are laid edge on. These are reused firebricks which are capable of withstanding heat but not good for load bearing (although handy for laying a pavement).\u00a0 The walls on the northwest and southeast sides both project in a southwest direction beyond the extent of the plinth (but how far, we have yet to see). Don’t know how high the original walls were but at a later date they were taken down and \u00a0in the south corner, covered with a thin layer of concrete\/ hardcore mix. Concrete also extended from the southeast-ward perhaps forming the floor of the factory.<\/a>The wall on the northwest side was found to have a wider foundation course and at the north end had a detached plinth.\u00a0Further excavations will hopefully reveal more.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>To check the extent of the pavement towards the north east Patrick opened a test pit on the other side of the path. Although there was no brick pavement there was a had surface, perhaps the base for the pavement with the bricks having been removed (a dumpy level check would confirm this).<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n<\/a>Around about dinner time we uncovered our first significant find. Darren had been probing to the NW of the pavement to see if he could locate the extent of if, digging small test pits to check if his probe hit anything. Instead of the pavement however he happened upon a large iron\u00a0bar (7cm x 6cm x 38cm ).\u00a0This was very much like the bars shown in the photographs of the interior of the steelworks – more likely to be a cast billet from the blast furnace delivered to the steelworks for remelting in the open heath furnaces. \u00a0Quite a nice find \u2013 bringing the activities on the site much closer to us.<\/a><\/a>(Image courtesy of WiganWorld)<\/p>\nThis Broomrape is one of the rare species found on the site (it’s a parasitic species in that it has no Chlorophyll relaying entirely on its host plant for nutrients). Mark said that in itself it wasn’t particularly rare but the total assemblage of species was remarkable for this part of the country.<\/p>\n<\/a> We used it to produce a reverse surveying map which we now intended to use to pinpoint the location of the Steel Works.<\/a>We thus set up our devices on our two stations, theodolite on the right and the dumpy on the left – manned by Neil and Andy respectively. The rest of us (me, Patrick and Dave North) set off to wonder about in the field with ranging poles trying to obeying instructions in an attempt to find the correct alignments. We had added letters to each point of the steel works shown and we tried to locate each one in turn.<\/p>\n<\/a>We needed to get the survey done before the vegetation starts to grow back \u00a0and our sight lines start to disappear. To be doubly sure, Neil brought his theodolite so we were able to double up on the readings.<\/a>The most difficult thing was being able to spot the same thing from both positions on Rabbit Rocks – Kirkless Hall from behind the trees could only be seen in parts and the canal bridge could only be seen fro the left hand station (despite using the extended surveyors staff with an extra piece on top). <\/a>The results from the survey will give us more confidence in locating the features of the steel works which we need to produce our project plan.<\/p>\n<\/a>The first features\u00a0were specifically selected as reference points that could be identified on the map. They included the canal bridge, Kirkless Hall itself, the east corner of the industrial estate fence and some building inside the industrial estate – all of which could be later\u00a0used to key in our survey. \u00a0The corner of the fence\u00a0was particularly challenging as it could not be seen directly – Eric was able to improvise using an extended survey staff with an orange plastic bag on top which could just be see above the trees – on a site as large as this, binoculars and walkie-talkies proving to be invaluable.We also recorded some features of the old works that still survive in the survey area i.e some stone blocks, a brick floor and a massive 2 metre high\u00a0lump of iron and brick. This peculiar feature seems to have been cast inside a brick room, leaving behind the impression of the walls of the room behind. The next stage is to overlay a map with the iron works on it so that we should be able to pin-point exactly where it was located in the current landscape.<\/a>Finish off the day by walking over other areas, outside our survey area to see what features have survived. To the east of the the main site there were two reservoirs \u00a0which have been back filled. A cutting marks the course of a rail line running round the top edge of the northern one – it’s marked out by this stone wall (1. on the map above).<\/a>The Springs Branch line once ran northwards in a cutting between the main site and the reservoirs. Little of it survives – except perhaps the remains of the brick bridge abutment where a line called the Round House Branch crossed over it (2. on the map above).<\/a>This line ran behind the blast furnaces before crossing the canal and looping round to eventually join the Whelley Loop line.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"